Subscribe to RSS
Download PDF
DOI: 10.1055/a-2499-4090
The Honest Enterprise Research Broker: Facilitating Ethical, Efficient, and Secure Access to Health Data for Research
Funding This study was supported by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (grant no.: UL1TR001881).
Abstract
Background Health systems generate and store vast amounts of clinical data, requiring structured processes to ensure that secondary use of the data is available to researchers in an efficient, ethical, and secure manner.
Objective We describe a process to provide data to health system researchers at a large, multi-hospital health system that balances efficiency with security and ethics.
Methods The Honest Enterprise Research Broker (HERB) Committee has enacted a systematic process to deliver investigators requesting data, using pre-written SQL code, when possible, to increase efficiency, providing a suite of self-service tools for cohort size estimation, and assessing the security and privacy of data leaving the institution. We evaluated the number of extracts per year, the average time to delivery of the data extract, and user satisfaction with the process.
Results From 2018 to 2023, the HERB Committee completed 487 data extracts. The number of requests increased from 51 in 2018 to 121 in 2023. Even as the number of extracts increased, the number of hours per extract decreased from 12.5 in 2018 to 9 in 2023. User satisfaction surveys found a high degree of satisfaction with the process.
Conclusion Through a process of continuous improvement, the HERB Committee has developed an expedient process to support the research needs of a large academic multi-hospital health system.
Protection of Human and Animal Subjects
No human subjects were involved in this analysis.
Publication History
Received: 28 May 2024
Accepted: 09 December 2024
Article published online:
30 April 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Ouyang D, He B, Ghorbani A. et al. Video-based AI for beat-to-beat assessment of cardiac function. Nature 2020; 580 (7802) 252-256
- 2 Govindappagari S, Greene N, Burwick R, Wong MS, Gregory KD. Maternal and neonatal morbidity after 4 and 6 hours of protracted active labor in nulliparous term pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 135 (01) 185-193
- 3 Feldman K, Duncan RG, Nguyen A. et al. Will Apple devices' passive atrial fibrillation detection prevent strokes? Estimating the proportion of high-risk actionable patients with real-world user data. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022; 29 (06) 1040-1049
- 4 Claerhout B, Kalra D, Mueller C. et al. Federated electronic health records research technology to support clinical trial protocol optimization: evidence from EHR4CR and the InSite platform. J Biomed Inform 2019; 90: 103090
- 5 Satterfield BA, Dikilitas O, Kullo IJ. Leveraging the electronic health record to address the COVID-19 pandemic. Mayo Clin Proc 2021; 96 (06) 1592-1608
- 6 Lee LM. Ethics and subsequent use of electronic health record data. J Biomed Inform 2017; 71: 143-146
- 7 U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. . Summary of the HIPAA Privacy Rule. Washington, DC: 2022
- 8 Office for Human Research Protections USDoHaHS. . Attachment D: FAQ's Terms and Recommendations on Informed Consent and Research Use of Biospecimens. In: SACHRP Recommendations. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2011
- 9 Boyd AD, Hosner C, Hunscher DA, Athey BD, Clauw DJ, Green LA. An “Honest Broker” mechanism to maintain privacy for patient care and academic medical research. Int J Med Inform 2007; 76 (5–6): 407-411
- 10 Obeid JS, Beskow LM, Rape M. et al. A survey of practices for the use of electronic health records to support research recruitment. J Clin Transl Sci 2017; 1 (04) 246-252
- 11 Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 (02) 377-381
- 12 Rt PAH, Minor BL, Elliott V. , et al The REDCap consortium. Building an international community of software partners. J Biomed Inform 2019; 95: 103208
- 13 Mukherjee S, Jenders RA, Delta S. Designing an innovative data architecture for the Los Angeles Data Resource (LADR). Stud Health Technol Inform 2015; 216: 1055
- 14 Bell DS SS, Jenders R, Fu P, Lee J, Patel A, Zachariah M, Masys MD. . The Los Angeles Data Resource (LADR): A Comprehensive Regional Data Resource for Research. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science; April 10, 2014 2014
- 15 Rothstein MA. Is deidentification sufficient to protect health privacy in research?. Am J Bioeth 2010; 10 (09) 3-11
- 16 Benitez K, Malin B. Evaluating re-identification risks with respect to the HIPAA privacy rule. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010; 17 (02) 169-177
- 17 Patel AA, Gilbertson JR, Showe LC. et al; PCABC. A novel cross-disciplinary multi-institute approach to translational cancer research: lessons learned from Pennsylvania Cancer Alliance Bioinformatics Consortium (PCABC). Cancer Inform 2007; 3: 255-274
- 18 Singh K, Jahnke I, Mosa ACalyam P. The winding road of requesting healthcare data for analytics purposes: using the one-interview mental model method for improving services of health data governance and big data request processes. J Bus Anal 2023; 6(1): 1-18